|
Sprehod
po ulici je najpogosteje omejen na opazovanje pritličij okoliških
stavb, bodisi v središču katere od svetovnih prestolnic ali v
predmestnem naselju. Pregrada, ki deli urbani prostor od interierja
stavbe, se je omejila na prozorno/porozno opno, osmišljeno tako,
da pritegne in zapelje opazovalca. Urbani prostor se je razširil
v pritličja, zasedel notranjost stanovanjskih otokov, spremenil
tloris mesta, ustvarjajoč gobasto strukturo, nad katero lebdijo
dejavnosti, ki pripadajo posamezniku in intimnosti. Če pripada
interier telesu, eksterier pa družbenemu redu, kot je trdil Loos,
se danes ta meja razteza horizontalno 4 metre nad tlemi. Z rastjo
števila dejavnosti, ki potrebujejo neposreden stik z urbanim prostorom
in njegovimi uporabniki, raste tudi tekmovanje za prepoznavnost
in pozornost.
(...)
|
|
A
walk down the street most often boils down to looking at the surrounding
buildings’ ground floors, whether in the centre of some world
metropolis or in a suburban populated area. The barrier separating
the urban space from a building’s interior has been reduced to
a transparent or porous membrane, with the purpose of attracting
and seducing the viewer. The urban space has slipped into ground
floors, occupied city blocks’ courtyards, has changed the city
layout by having created a sponge-like structure above which hover
the activities that belong to the individual and intimacy. If
interior space belongs to the body and the exterior to the social
order, as Loos claimed, that borderline is today confined to a
height of approximately 4 m above the ground. With an increase
in the number of activities requiring direct contact with the
urban space and
its users, the competition for recognisability and attention grows.
(...)
|
|