|
oris
V sedemdesetih letih, v prvem obdobju poklicnega življenja, ste
se večinoma ukvarjali s konceptualnimi projekti, predavanji, raziskavami,
pisanjem in premišljevanjem o osnovah arhitekture. Vaše takratno
delovanje bilo v skladu z duhom časa, in to ne samo v arhitekturi.
To je bilo obdobje uveljavljanja konceptualne umetnosti in odmikov
od konvencionalnih umetniških artefaktov k drugačnemu pojmovanju
umetniške prakse.
tschumi
Morda je bil to res duh časa, morda pa je bilo še kaj več od tega.
V resnici je obstajala potreba po iskanju odgovorov, kaj pravzaprav
je arhitektura. Z drugimi besedami, v dvajsetem stoletju je najprej
obstajala vrsta nedvoumnih zadev, ki so se izoblikovale skozi
izjave v času gibanja moderne, ki je poskušalo definirati, kaj
je arhitektura. Te nedvoumne, gotove zadeve so se pokazale kot
nekako neizvedljive. Morebiti so obljubljale precej, omogočale
pa zelo malo. Naj kot primer navedem način, kako so se projektirale
mestne četrti – ta mesta so se pokazala kot neizvedljiva. Niso
izpolnila svojih obljub v smislu socialnega, kulturološkega in
drugih kontekstov.
oris
V tistem trenutku je bilo modernistično gibanje tudi deloma zasedeno
s korporativno arhitekturo, avantgardni položaj gibanja je bil
izgubljen, utopični ideali pa so postali dvomljivi.
tschumi
Če pomislite na Francijo in nova mesta okoli Pariza, je bila arhitektura
zares korporativna, celo birokratska. Pomanjkanje kredibilnosti
arhitekture šestdesetih let je pomenilo, da sem čutil, da je zadeve
mogoče radikalno premisliti. Začel sem delovati ne iz središča
arhitekture, ampak na obrobjih. Preučil sem druge discipline in
iskal povezavo z arhitekturnimi interesi ali vprašanji. Arhitekturo
sem poskušal doumeti skozi robove, skozi margino, zato sem se
obrnil k umetnosti, filozofiji, matematiki itn. Raziskovanje v
tem obdobju je bilo zares opravljeno skozi pisanje, skozi teorijske
risbe, teorijske projekte, kot so Manhattan Transcripts, Screenplays,
Manifestos itn. Tako se je vse začelo.
(...)
|
|
oris
During the first part of your professional life in the seventies,
you were mostly involved with conceptual projects, with teaching,
research, writing and reflecting on the fundaments of architecture.
In a way, your engagement was close to the spirit of the time,
not only in architecture. It was a period of growth of conceptual
art and shift away from artistic artefact to different notions
of artistic practices.
tschumi
Maybe it was the spirit of the time, but maybe it was more than
that. There was really a need to question what architecture was
all about. In other words, throughout the 20th century, there
had been first a number of certainties that were established through
the statements made by the modern movement, trying to define what
architecture was. Think of Le Corbusier and the five points of
architecture. These certainties had proved somehow not workable.
Namely, it may have promised a lot but delivered very little.
Take the way the new city quarters were designed, these cities
proved to be not workable. They did not fulfil their promises
in terms of social, cultural and other contexts.
oris
At that moment, the modern movement was also partly absorbed in
corporate architecture, its avant-garde position was lost and
the utopian ideals were brought under the question.
tschumi
Architecture was quite corporate and even bureaucratic, if you
think of France and the new towns around Paris. The lack of credibility
of architecture at the time in the sixties meant that I felt that
things had to be questioned radically and started to work not
within the centre of architecture, but on the margins. I looked
at other disciplines, searching where the connection point was
with architectural concerns or questions. I was interested in
art, literature, philosophy, mathematics, cinema etc. trying to
learn about architecture through the edges, through the margins.
So much of the exploration at the time of the work that I did
was indeed through writing, through theoretical drawings, theoretical
projects, like the Manhattan Transcripts, like the Screenplays,
like the Manifestos and so on. And that’s how it all started.
(...)
|
|