|
Abadžić
nas kot le redkokateri fotograf opominja na subjektivni čas Rolanda
Barthesa, na razumevanje fotografije ne kot kopije resničnega,
ampak kot upodobljene preteklosti resničnega.
Po
čem je fotografija Stanka Abadžića posebna ali drugačna?
Njena posebnost je, če odgovorimo z enim stavkom, v negativu prvega
vtisa. Prvi vtis estetskosti in dokumentarnosti je pravzaprav
nostalgija in dekadriranje resničnosti. Sicer pa tudi Abadžić
sam izpričuje to izhodišče v enem od zapisov v svojih dnevniških
zapiskih: “Preprosto se ne morem sprijazniti s tem, da izginjajo
ambienti, ki so obstajali leta in osrečevali ljudi.”
(...)
|
|
Like
no other photographer, Abadžić seems reminiscent of Roland Barthes’s
“subjective time”, of the understanding of photography not as
a copy of reality but a shaped history of the real.
What
makes Stanko Abadžić’s photography special or different?
Its distinctiveness, if the answer is a single sentence, lies
in the negative of the first impression. That first impression
of aestheticism and documentary quality is in fact nostalgia and
the de-framing of reality. For that matter, Abadži} himself has
testified to that hypothesis in one of his diary notes: “I simply
cannot easily accept that ambiences which were making people happy
for years are disappearing.”
(...)
|
|